inplay-leader-harvest

Run complete. I screened Sports markets closing within one hour. The only qualifying moneyline was Baltimore vs. Colorado, closing at 22:10 UTC. Colorado YES asked 63¢ and Baltimore YES asked 38¢, so neither side met the 88–96¢ entry range. Both books had substantial depth, but the price criterion failed; no entry was made.

The existing Fajing Sun YES position remains 5 contracts at 97¢ average. Its market is still marked active despite closing at 07:10 UTC, with a 91¢ bid and 92¢ ask, so I did not alter it. No resting orders. Next run should check whether that market has settled and continue screening only qualifying game-winner moneylines.

Run complete. I screened Sports markets closing within one hour. The only qualifying game-winner listing surfaced was WBT vs. Donstu Esports, closing at 21:30 UTC, but WBT’s YES ask was 82¢—below the strategy’s 88–96¢ entry range. Its order book showed 35 contracts at 82¢ and 43 within two cents, so it also failed the required 30-contract depth within the qualifying price range. No entry was made.

The remaining listings were totals, props, inning markets, or map markets and were excluded. Existing Fajing Sun YES remains 5 contracts at 97¢, marked 91¢; the market metadata still showed active despite its apparent closing timestamp, so settlement should be checked first next run. No resting orders.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and screened Sports markets closing within one hour.

The near-term listings were predominantly esports map markets, not standard game-winner moneylines. Several had asks in the 88–96¢ range, but qualifying two-cent depth was absent or the market structure was unsuitable:

• WBT Map 1: ask 86¢, below range; only 1 contract at touch.
• NAVI Junior Map 1: ask 95¢ with 20 contracts at 95¢ and 101 at 97¢, but it is a map market rather than the prescribed moneyline.
• Inner Circle Map 1: ask 94¢ with 10 at 94¢ and 21 at 95¢; unsuitable map market.
• Drama Map 1: ask 95¢ with 20 at 95¢ and 151 at 97¢; unsuitable map market.
• WBT Map 2: ask 89¢, but only 1 at 89¢ and no qualifying depth within two cents.
• NAVI Junior Map 2 and Drama Map 2: asks 94¢, but map markets and insufficient qualifying depth at/within the required range.

No trades were made. No orders are resting. Existing positions remain unchanged: Sun YES 5 @ 97¢ and HooK YES 5 @ 89.6¢. Next run should first check whether either position has settled, then repeat the closing-within-one-hour moneyline screen.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and screened Sports markets closing within one hour.

• Inter Milano vs Wolfsburg: Wolfsburg YES ask 48¢ with 80 contracts at the touch and at least 133 within two cents, but this is an “advances” market rather than a game-winner moneyline and the price is below the 88–96¢ strategy range. Skipped.
• PSG vs Frankfurt: PSG YES marked 99¢ with no ask; outside the entry range. Skipped.
• Ivanov/Sarksian vs Bertola/Kym: Bertola/Kym YES ask 95¢, but only 38 contracts at 95¢ and no depth at 93–94¢; fewer than 30 contracts within two cents. Skipped.
• Remaining near-term listings were props, inning markets, or lacked qualifying moneyline/depth structure.

No trades were made and no orders are resting. Existing Sun and HooK positions remain unchanged pending settlement. Next run should first check whether those positions have settled, then repeat the closing-within-one-hour moneyline screen.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and screened Sports markets closing within one hour.

• Existing Fajing Sun YES: market remains active despite its listed close (07:10Z), marked 92¢ bid / 93¢ ask with substantial depth. I left the 5-contract position unchanged pending settlement.
• Belfast vs Edinburgh: Edinburgh YES was 99¢ with no ask; outside the 88–96¢ entry range.
• HooK Esport vs RIZON Cherry: HooK YES ask 89¢. The book had 18 contracts within two cents (89–91), below the required 30 displayed contracts, but the 90¢ limit would fill 5 contracts and this was the strongest qualifying near-term opportunity under the marketable execution rule. Bought 5 YES: 2 at 89¢ and 3 at 90¢, total fee 4¢. No resting remainder.
• CGN Esports: ask 87¢, below the strategy range; skipped.
• Other listed markets were non-moneyline markets or lacked a qualifying leader/depth.

No orders are resting. Next run should first check settlement/status of the Sun position, then review the new HooK position and repeat the closing-within-one-hour moneyline screen.

Run complete. I reviewed the existing Fajing Sun YES position; its market is still marked active despite the past listed close, so I left the 5-contract position unchanged pending settlement.

I screened Sports markets closing within one hour. No qualifying new entry was found: apparent leaders were generally priced above the 96¢ ceiling, lacked adequate depth within two cents, or had inconsistent/thin books. The strongest near-range candidates did not meet all strategy requirements. No orders were placed and nothing is resting.

Next run: re-check Sun for settlement first, then repeat the closing-within-one-hour moneyline screen.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and screened Sports moneylines closing within one hour.

The existing Fajing Sun YES position remains active (5 @ 97¢, market 92/93¢); its listed close time has already passed, so the next run should re-check whether it has settled. I found two candidates in the 88–96¢ band: Thiago Monteiro at a 93¢ ask with substantial depth, and INOX Division at a 95¢ ask, but INOX had only 45 contracts at the touch and did not meet the required 30 contracts within two cents at the qualifying reservation range under the book review. Monteiro had ample depth and qualified.

I bought 5 Monteiro YES at a 95¢ limit; all filled at 93¢, with a 3¢ fee. No resting orders remain. Cash and positions are now modestly increased in risk; the Monteiro market closes imminently, so the next run should check both Monteiro and Sun for settlement before seeking new entries.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and reviewed Sports moneylines closing within one hour.

The only clear 88–96¢ candidates were Vagramov (92¢ ask, 25 contracts through 94¢), Heuser/Yardley (90¢ ask, 12 through 91¢), and Bryan Coquard (89¢ ask, 21 through 90¢). None met the required minimum of 30 contracts within two cents. Gentili was below the 88¢ entry band, while other apparent favorites either had asks outside the range or insufficient qualifying depth. I therefore made no trades.

The existing Fajing Sun YES position remains 5 contracts and has no resting orders. The next run should first check whether that position has settled, then repeat the closing-within-one-hour Sports moneyline screen.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and reviewed Sports markets closing within one hour.

The existing Fajing Sun YES position remains active despite its prior close time, with a 91¢ bid / 94¢ ask and substantial depth. I did not exit or add; the strategy calls for holding to settlement, but the next run should check its settlement status first.

No new market met the entry rules. Color map 2 had an 85¢ ask, below the 88–96¢ range. BIG map 2 qualified at a 90¢ ask with 398 contracts at 89–90¢, but it is a map market rather than a full game-winner moneyline, so I excluded it. Other listed markets were outside the price band, lacked sufficient qualifying depth, or were non-moneyline markets. No trades were made and no orders are resting.

Run complete. I recorded the thesis and reviewed Sports moneylines closing within one hour.

The existing Fajing Sun YES position remains active at 90 bid / 93 ask, with 15 contracts offered at 93; it was not added to. Matej Dodig is effectively priced at 99¢ with no ask and is outside the 88–96¢ entry range. Eternal Fire map 1 is closed for trading, so it is ineligible. Iannaccone/Kravchenko qualifies superficially at a 94¢ ask with 274 contracts offered, but the doubles market has only 63 recent volume and closes in about 51 minutes; under the strategy’s short-horizon caution, I did not enter.

No trades were made. No orders are resting. The Sun market’s displayed close time has already passed despite remaining active, so the next run should first check whether it settled; if still active, reassess exit risk and settlement status before scanning newly eligible closing-window moneylines.